State v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a DUI charge arising out of a traffic stop could not be characterized as complex
• concluding that a DUI charge arising out of a traffic stop could not be characterized as complex
• considering eighteen months as relevant time of delay where initial case was pending for ten months before State dismissed and refiled charges in subsequent case that lasted eight months
• where although an arrest occurred the same day in October 2002 as a DUI offense, the State dismissed the charge, only to refile a complaint in September 2003
• “[W]e apply the stricter [speedy trial] standard found in our state constitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Moore
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2010-04-12· cited 29×
• State v. Averett
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2006-03-03· cited 26×
• State v. Lopez
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2007-05-16· cited 16×
• State v. Robert Benjamin Brackett
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2016-06-14· cited 14×
• State v. Avila
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2006-06-09· cited 11×
• State v. Lankford
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2023-07-12· cited 10×
• State v. Craig C. Risdon
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2012-12-21· cited 5×
• State v. Dustin Jade Mrgan
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2017-06-27· cited 4×
• State v. Albert A. Ciccone
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2012-12-11· cited 2×
• State v. Crockett
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2011-06-10· cited 2×
• State v. Rowland
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2024-01-09· cited 1×
• State v. Caudill
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2024-03-08· cited 1×
• State v. Summers
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2011-11-02
• State v. Robert Benjamin Brackett
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2016-04-27