State v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing that the offenders' crimes are not distinguishable from Manussier, Rivers, and Thorne and, therefore, that a challenge arguing that the sentences were cruel would be frivolous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hairston
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-11-13· cited 67×
• State v. Moretti
  Washington Supreme Court· 2019-08-15· cited 44×
• State v. Cruz
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-06-22· cited 9×
• State v. Bridges
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-05-18· cited 2×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• Reynolds v. Sims
  Supreme Court· 1964-10-12· cited 3,703×
• New York v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-19· cited 1,301×
• State v. Thorne
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 352×
• State v. Manussier
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 269×
• State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. Sawyer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-02-21· cited 171×
• State v. Montez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-04-03· cited 170×
• State v. Theobald
  Washington Supreme Court· 1970-06-04· cited 140×
• State v. Rivers
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 139×
• McKee v. City of Louisville
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1980-09-08· cited 52×
• California Gillnetters Ass'n v. Department of Fish & Game
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-10-30· cited 24×
• New Progressive Party v. Hernandez Colon
  D. Puerto Rico· 1991-11-15· cited 19×
• Iman v. Southern Pacific Company
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-01-02· cited 16×
• State v. Owen
  Washington Supreme Court· 1917-07-31· cited 11×
• State v. Davis
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-09-11· cited 8×