Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/11/1985

State v. Davis

Citations

697 P.2d 1321
237 Kan. 155
1985 Kan. LEXIS 359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

district court abused its discretion by not allowing defendant to present surrebuttal evidence after both parties rested
district court abused its discretion by not allowing defendant to present surrebuttal evidence after both parties rested
\[I]nquiry into whether the witness was offered any 'arrangement or deal' by the State in exchange for his testimony is crucial.\
\[I]nquiry into whether the witness was offered any 'arrangement or deal' by the State in exchange for his [or her] testimony is crucial.\
no abuse of discretion to limit cross-examination of State’s witness for bias to witness’ deal with the State without further details
inquiry into whether the witness was offered any “ ‘arrangement or deal’ ” by the State in exchange for his testimony is crucial; juiy knew that through plea bargaining, codefendant had avoided the risk of conviction of the more serious charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Lockett, Prager, Herd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.