Skip to main content
· 3/17/2015

State v. David Pomianek, Jr. (072293)

Citations

  • 221 N.J. 66
  • 110 A.3d 841
  • 2015 N.J. LEXIS 275
  • 126 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 963

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining whether a sentence is unconstitutional is an issue of law subject to de novo review
  • finding a statute unconstitutional for focusing on the victim's perception instead of the defendant's intent
  • “We . . . assume that the Legislature would want us to construe the statute in a way that conforms to the Constitution.”
  • discussing the doctrine of constitutional avoidance
  • discussing the doctrine of constitutional avoidance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Albin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.