State v. David M. Gibson (070910)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that probable cause is a well-grounded suspicion that a crime has been committed
• explaining that probable cause is a well-grounded suspicion that a crime has been committed
• explaining an officer's hunch, even if later proven correct, does not justify an investigatory stop
• “[T]he duration of the incursion . . . is a factor.”
• “[0]nce an officer lawfully arrests a suspect, he has the right and duty to search him for weapons and contraband before placing him in a patrol ear.” (citing Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 762-63, 89 S.Ct. 2034, 2040, 23 L.Ed.2d 685, 694 (1969))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).