Supreme Court of Louisiana· 4/1/1985
State v. David
Citations
- 468 So. 2d 1133
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- jury finding that single aggravating factor exists does not amount to an acquittal of other aggravating factors presented to jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Calogero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ward v. WhitleyFifth Circuit· 1994-05-18· cited 117×
- Commonwealth v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-10-04· cited 114×
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1986-10-20· cited 109×
- State v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court· 1996-04-15· cited 50×
- State v. KoedatichSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-04-19· cited 34×
- GEO-JE'S CIVIC ASS'N INC. v. ReedLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1988-03-17· cited 14×
- Tasker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-11-10· cited 13×
- State v. HundleyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2000-03-22· cited 11×
- State v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1988-02-03· cited 8×
- State v. ConwayLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1990-02-07· cited 7×
- State v. ColemanLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1988-07-06· cited 6×
- State v. DavenportLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2013-07-03· cited 1×
- State v. DefioreLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1992-12-16· cited 1×
- State v. RobinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1993-12-15· cited 1×
- State v. O'NealSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-04-25
- State v. HuckabyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1986-10-08
- State of Louisiana v. Phillip Dominick, IIILouisiana Court of Appeal· 2023-06-06
- State of Louisiana v. Alicia WhiteLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2025-11-07
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 1,657×
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court· 1977-04-04· cited 1,460×
- United States v. BallSupreme Court· 1896-05-25· cited 1,376×
- Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1981-05-04· cited 875×
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court· 1973-05-21· cited 874×
- United States v. TateoSupreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 864×
- Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-03-19· cited 557×
- Stroud v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1919-11-24· cited 398×
- Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1950-02-06· cited 297×
- Forman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-02-23· cited 239×
- Gates v. ZantSupreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 136×
- State v. FlowersSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1983-09-02· cited 127×
- Ross v. ReedSupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 108×
- Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1983-05-27· cited 104×
- Charlie Young, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Center, Cross-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1982-05-14· cited 95×
- Neal v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 93×
- John Henry Knapp, Arizona State Prison Inmate No. 33659, and All Inmates of the Arizona State Prison Similarly Situated v. Harold CardwellNinth Circuit· 1982-01-19· cited 92×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.