Skip to main content

State v. Davic

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 1662

Syllabus

Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not err when overruling appellant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea under Crim.R. 32.1 because he did not demonstrate the manifest injustice required to overcome the res judicata bar on postsentence plea withdrawal. Appellant's arguments are all subject to res judicata, as they rely entirely on the trial court record available during the direct appeal.

Judges: Mentel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.