State v. Davalos-Romo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that consequential damages, such as lost profits, loss of goodwill, and the cost of moving to a new facility, are not awardable under the Fifth Amendment
• discussing dam- ages principle that “[j]ust compensation requires putting the property owner in as good a position pecuniarily as if his property had not been taken” and limits on takings damages such as exclusion of consequential damages
• “Where the government takes a permanent right of access, akin to an easement in gross, even if used only intermittently, it is unquestionably an appropriation of the owner’s right to exclude.”
• “Plaintiffs bear the burden of establishing subject-matter jurisdiction.”
• “Section 2501’s six-year limitation is jurisdictional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).