State v. Darrah

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court made no specific findings of fact, but acted reasonably because defendant was central to the conspiracy and acted as a leader in the commission of the crimes
• district court abuses judicial discretion by ruling in a way no reasonable judicial officer would under the circumstances, if it ignores controlling facts or relies on unproven factual representations, or if it acts outside the legal framework appropriate to the issue
• outlining all three bases for an abuse of discretion
• outlining all three bases for an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Edwards
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2020-07-17· cited 6×
• State v. Peterson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2025-08-22

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ward
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-07-29· cited 1,316×
• State v. Shank
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2016-04-15· cited 65×
• State v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2015-02-27· cited 15×