State v. D'ARCO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that consistency of verdicts on multiple counts in a single trial is not necessary where evidence supports a guilty verdict
• noting the irrelevance of consistency in verdicts and reviewing the evidence supporting defendant's misconduct conviction
• court did not consider whether hearsay statements were properly admitted under Evidence Rule 63(9)(b) because the independent proof of the substantive crimes showed that admission could not be harmful error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).