Skip to main content

State v. Dantzler

Citations

  • 591 So. 2d 1385
  • 1991 La. App. LEXIS 3527
  • 1991 WL 276985

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant not prejudiced by pre-trial non-identification because it was brought to jury’s attention and it was not established that defendant’s photograph was in the lineup

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Gulotta, Schott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.