Skip to main content

State v. Daniels

Citations

  • 13 Conn. App. 133
  • 534 A.2d 1253
  • 1987 Conn. App. LEXIS 1159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was no suppression for Brady purposes where the defendant elicited the exculpatory evidence by cross-examining a State’s witness
  • holding that there was no suppression for Brady purposes where the defendant elicited the exculpatory evidence by cross-examining a State's witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Borden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.