Skip to main content

State v. Daniels

Citations

  • 680 N.E.2d 829
  • 1997 Ind. LEXIS 73
  • 1997 WL 277990

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • comparing Indiana Post-Conviction Rule 1(4)(g) with Indiana Trial Rule 56 and stating, “[s]pecific findings and conclusions are neither required nor prohibited in the summary judgment context”
  • finding that the trial court did not enter a judgment of conviction where it only stated that the guilty plea was taken under advisement; there was no evidence that the trial court accepted the guilty plea; and there was no order book entry finding the defendant guilty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepaed, Dickson, Sullivan, Selby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.