State v. Daniels
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4876
Syllabus
The sentence imposed on appellant for complicity to felonious assault was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law because it was within the statutory range for the offense and the trial court stated in its sentencing entry that it had considered the principles and purposes of sentencing of R.C. 2929.11 and the seriousness and recidivism factors of R.C. 2929.12. Based on the authority of State v. Hacker, 2023-Ohio-2535, appellant's indefinite sentence imposed under the Reagan Tokes Law did not violate her constitutional right to due process. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court· 1999-06-07· cited 6,799×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-17· cited 175×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-03· cited 113×
- State v. PawlakOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-22· cited 75×
- State v. TrentOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-15· cited 18×
- State v. BattleOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-10· cited 15×
- State v. BenedictOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-26· cited 12×
- State v. LoffingOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-11· cited 4×
- State v. BowenOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.