State v. Daniels
Citations
- 250 N.E.3d 1290
- 2024 Ohio 3392
Syllabus
MOTION TO SUPPRESS – TRAFFIC STOP: The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress the evidence recovered from defendant's vehicle following a traffic stop, because police officers had probable cause and/or reasonable suspicion to conduct defendant's traffic stop: the police officer testified unequivocally that defendant had failed to use a signal when moving from the right lane to the left lane in violation of Cincinnati Mun.Code 506-80, and the rear and side windows of defendant's vehicle were heavily tinted.
Judges: Winkler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.