Skip to main content

State v. Daniels

Citations

  • 250 N.E.3d 1290
  • 2024 Ohio 3392

Syllabus

MOTION TO SUPPRESS – TRAFFIC STOP: The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress the evidence recovered from defendant's vehicle following a traffic stop, because police officers had probable cause and/or reasonable suspicion to conduct defendant's traffic stop: the police officer testified unequivocally that defendant had failed to use a signal when moving from the right lane to the left lane in violation of Cincinnati Mun.Code 506-80, and the rear and side windows of defendant's vehicle were heavily tinted.

Judges: Winkler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.