State v. Danforth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• using ellipsis to indicate conviction for criminal sexual conduct by itself satisfies subdivision 1(a)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Danforth v. Minnesota
  Supreme Court· 2008-02-20· cited 416×
• Danforth v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-02-26· cited 36×
• Danforth v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-07-27· cited 17×
• State v. Grossman
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-04-17· cited 11×
• Danforth v. Crist
  Eighth Circuit· 2010-10-25· cited 4×
• State v. Hendry
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-12-04· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Idaho v. Wright
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
• In Re Blodgett
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-01-14· cited 97×
• State v. Lanam
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-08-10· cited 51×
• State v. Kelley
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-06-24· cited 35×
• State v. O'HAGAN
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-08-27· cited 26×
• State v. Goldenstein
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-08-17· cited 24×
• State v. Scott
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-06-11· cited 16×
• State v. Yant
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-11-12· cited 14×
• State v. Fields
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-03-14· cited 2×