State v. Dancel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In analyzing § 1983 claims for unconstitutional false arrest, we have generally looked to the law of the state in which the arrest occurred.”
• objective standard applied to police officers’ use of force in effectuating arrest
• “In analyzing [Section] 1983 claims for unconstitutional false 6 The Court notes that Mr. Shakur’s due process challenges concern “mixed sanctions,” i.e., “sanctions that affect both (a) the duration of his imprisonment and (b
• “To establish a claim of excessive force, ‘a plaintiff must show that the force used by the officer was, in light of the facts and circumstances confronting him, ‘objectively unreasonable’ under Fourth Amendment standards.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).