State v. Damron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trial court’s policy of destroying a guilty plea hearing tape after ten years did not relieve the petitioner of the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that he was not advised of his Boykin rights
• holding that the premature destruction of the tape of the petitioner’s guilty plea hearing did not render the record silent for purposes of Boykin and that the petitioner had failed to meet his burden of proving that he was not informed of his Boykin rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Flanders v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2011-09-19· cited 27×
• Bethea v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-03-20· cited 7×
• Anthony Hogan v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-04-19
• Curtis A. Bethea v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-03-20
• Antonio T. Collier v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-08-08

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boykin v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
• Parke v. Raley
  Supreme Court· 1993-01-19· cited 1,268×
• Hall v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2006-06-20· cited 162×
• Lawrence Dalton v. Deirdre Battaglia, Warden, State-Ville Correctional Center
  Seventh Circuit· 2005-03-23· cited 57×
• State v. Cozart
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2008-12-10· cited 13×