State v. Dalziel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial judges do not have “discretion to reject a mitigating factor altogether” despite “evidence in the record”
• concluding that aggravating and mitigating factors supported by record \must be a part of the deliberative process\
• concluding that aggravating and mitigating factors supported by record “must be a part of the deliberative process”
• holding that where mitigating factors are supported by the record, they \must be part of the deliberative process\
• HOLDING THAT TRIAL JUDGES DO NOT HAVE \DISCRETION TO REJECT A MITIGATING FACTOR ALTOGETHER\ DESPITE \EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD\
• holding statements by co-conspirator to establish a plan to prevent detection of himself and, in turn, the defendant furthered the conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).