State v. Daly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘it is well estab- lished that as an appellate tribunal, we do not find facts’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Richardson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-05-12· cited 14×
• State v. Kallberg
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2017-06-13· cited 12×
• Stec v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-04-28· cited 8×
• People v. Smollett
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2024-11-21· cited 6×
• State v. Dayton
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2017-10-03· cited 4×
• State v. Navarro
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2017-04-25· cited 2×
• State v. Butler
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2021-12-07· cited 2×
• Spak v. Phillips
  D. Connecticut· 2015-10-13· cited 2×
• Stephenson v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-04-28· cited 1×
• In re Siddiqui
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-02-11
• State v. Daly
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-11