Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2/25/1983

State v. Daly

Citations

659 P.2d 83
4 Haw. App. 52
1983 Haw. App. LEXIS 97

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that common sense must be employed when interpreting an indictment and that an “essential element need not be expressed with the magic wordsf.]”
holding that common sense must be employed when interpreting an indictment and that an \essential element need not be expressed with the magic words[.]\
explaining that, for an indictment to be valid, it must, inter alia, \`apprise[ ] the defendant of what he [or she] must be prepared to meet'\
explaining that, for an indictment to be valid, it must, inter alia, “‘apprise[ ] the defendant of what he [or she] must be prepared to meet’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Heen, Tanaka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.