State v. Dalling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that indictment was void ab initio, requiring dismissal of a criminal case
• “Upon the expiration of its term under I.C.R. 6(j), the grand jury no longer had the authority to meet and return indictments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lute
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2011-04-20· cited 61×
• State v. Bent
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-06-28· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carey v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1967-06-30· cited 53×
• State v. Edmonson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1987-05-29· cited 38×
• State v. Ellington
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1895-12-16· cited 30×
• State v. Odiaga
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1994-02-03· cited 24×
• State v. Bacon
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1990-04-23· cited 17×
• Gasper v. District Court of Seventh Judicial Dist.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1953-11-10· cited 17×
• State v. Bell
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1962-03-02· cited 14×
• State v. Whelan
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-09-15· cited 9×