Nebraska Supreme Court· 3/10/1995
State v. Dake
Citations
- 529 N.W.2d 46
- 247 Neb. 579
- 1995 Neb. LEXIS 56
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that law enforcement did not have a duty to transport an arrestee in order for independent testing
- finding that while “the police cannot hamper a motorist’s efforts to obtain independent testing, they are under no duty to assist in obtaining such testing beyond allowing telephone calls to secure the test”
- explaining that § 25-1127 “does not apply to criminal cases”
- permitting requested independent test is foundational to admission into evidence of result of breath test performed by State
- while police cannot hamper a motorist’s efforts to obtain independent testing, they are under no duty to assist in obtaining such testing beyond allowing telephone calls to obtain the test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Caporale, Fahrnbruch, Lanphier, Wright, Connolly, Boslaugh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BaueNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-03-10· cited 124×
- Unruh v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-03-07· cited 85×
- State v. BlackmanNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-07-02· cited 82×
- State v. LariveeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-01-30· cited 39×
- State v. OsbornNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-05-10· cited 35×
- State v. VeimanNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-04-19· cited 34×
- State v. ConklinNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-03-29· cited 27×
- State v. WilenNebraska Court of Appeals· 1995-11-07· cited 23×
- State v. LynchNebraska Supreme Court· 1995-06-16· cited 22×
- State v. HingstNebraska Supreme Court· 1997-01-17· cited 22×
- State v. SinselNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-02-16· cited 16×
- State v. HiemstraNebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-05-05· cited 12×
- Chase v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2001-12-04· cited 11×
- State v. VanderfordNebraska Supreme Court· 2022-10-14· cited 11×
- State v. ConnickNebraska Court of Appeals· 1997-01-23· cited 10×
- State v. JasaNebraska Supreme Court· 2017-09-22· cited 10×
- State v. ChakerianNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-05-11· cited 7×
- State v. RomoNebraska Court of Appeals· 2004-03-30· cited 4×
- State v. SmithNebraska Court of Appeals· 1995-09-19· cited 2×
- State v. WeberNebraska Supreme Court· 2026-03-06· cited 2×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- State v. DyerNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-03-18· cited 122×
- State v. BurlingNebraska Supreme Court· 1987-02-13· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. AlanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-04-26· cited 54×
- State v. FranklinNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-09-25· cited 49×
- State v. KubikNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-06-15· cited 47×
- In re KoehneCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-10-27· cited 43×
- State v. LozanoNebraska Supreme Court· 1981-10-23· cited 35×
- State v. SnipesSupreme Court of Missouri· 1972-02-22· cited 26×
- State v. WestNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-05-18· cited 17×
- State v. HatlestadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-05-08· cited 15×
- State v. KarelNebraska Supreme Court· 1979-10-02· cited 15×
- Provo City v. WernerCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-04-11· cited 14×
- State v. KarmenSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-11-18· cited 7×
- Ruch v. ConradNebraska Supreme Court· 1995-02-03· cited 6×
- State v. HamiltonNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-06-22· cited 4×
Other cases named State v. Dake
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.