State v. Dague
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8603
Syllabus
Appellant's sentence of 16 months for a felony of the fourth degree is within the statutory range and not contrary to law, and the court was not required to make any statutory findings in imposing sentence. Appellant's argument that the probation officer preparing the presentence investigation report failed to interview Appellant, and that Appellant should have been \re-referred\ for a presentence interview prior to sentencing, is belied by the presentence investigation report, which reflects that Appellant failed to contact the officer by means of the number provided to him, and the officer attempted to contact Appellant multiple times for an interview. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. RodefferOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-27· cited 137×
- State v. CastleOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-15· cited 44×
- State v. CochranOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-20· cited 24×
- State v. FolkOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-06· cited 12×
- State v. McCoyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-21· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.