State v. Daggett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, under Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 771, that defendant could not prevail with argument that blood draw was unreasonable where defendant alleged but failed to produce any evidence that circumstances of blood draw were, in fact, “unsanitary”
• noting that Schmerber “did not categorically reject the possibility that a blood draw could take place in a non-medical setting” and that blood draws need not “take place in a hospital setting in order to be constitutionally reasonable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Johnston
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-03-16· cited 160×
• State v. Johnston
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2009-11-05· cited 26×
• Wetsch v. North Dakota Department of Transportation
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-05-05· cited 14×
• State v. May
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-06-03· cited 3×
• State of Arizona v. Kenneth Allen May
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-06-03
• State v. Christi Lynn Johnston
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-11-05
• State of Texas v. Johnston, Christi Lynn
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-03-16
• State v. Patrick K. Kozel
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2017-01-12
• Christopher Wayne West v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2021-07-30

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schmerber v. California
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
• State v. Sickler
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-07-22· cited 21×