State v. D. M. W.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government could compel website operator to post factual information about potential criminal liability if patrons used website to evade taxes
• “An advertisement is fraudulent when it misleads cus- tomers about the benefit of the offered product.”
• “Because we can uphold the injunction as an appropriate restriction on fraudulent commercial speech, we do not need to address the alternate [basis] cited by the district court to support the injunction, inciting imminent lawless behavior.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).