State v. Cyr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in the criminal law context, when applying due process protections against undue delay Maine has required a showing of “actual and unjustifiable prejudice resulting from a delay in seeking an indictment” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Maine v. Clarence Cote
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2015-06-23· cited 34×
• State v. Kremen
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-06-21· cited 21×
• Seider v. Board of Examiners of Psychologists
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-06-23· cited 15×
• State v. Rippy
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1993-05-28· cited 11×
• John Doe v. Maine Board of Osteopathic Licensure
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2020-11-17· cited 7×
• State v. McFarland
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-09-02· cited 1×
• State v. McFarland (Third Concurrence)
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-09-02

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Lovasco
  Supreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 2,170×
• State v. Berkley
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1989-12-11· cited 20×
• State v. Lewis
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1990-12-20· cited 18×
• State v. Hutchins
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-08-13· cited 15×