Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/5/2023
State v. C.W.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4393
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in denying both appellant's petition for postconviction relief and delayed motion for leave to file a motion for new trial. Appellant's petition for postconviction relief was barred by res judicata and the delayed motion for leave was not timely. Judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas affirmed.
Judges: Leland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-26· cited 691×
- State v. Bethel (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-03-22· cited 161×
- State v. HattonOhio Supreme Court· 2022-11-10· cited 113×
- State v. CashinOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-28· cited 30×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-14· cited 18×
- State v. LundyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-21· cited 14×
- State v. MeekOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-26· cited 12×
- State v. [C.W.]Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-17· cited 11×
- Williams v. Am. Homes 4 Rent Mgt. Holdings, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-17· cited 8×
- State v. VillarealOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-03· cited 6×
- State v. WhitesideOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-27· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.