State v. Custom Pools

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing consumer’s action against finance company that assisted a pool sales company in fraudulently obtaining mortgage deeds on consumers’ homes
• interpreting “use” in Vermont’s analogous consumer protection act as “‘[t]o make use of, to convert to one’s service, to avail one’s self of, to employ’”
• this Court’s primary objective in interpreting the VCFA is to give meaning and effect to its underlying legislative purpose
• if Legislature intended that Attorney General cannot sue a finance company that benefitted from the consumer fraud of a seller, “it could have done so with clear language to that effect”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).