State v. Cusick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• jury could have inferred from proximity after accident that cocaine-user kit had been next to defendant’s wallet
• jury could have inferred joint possession from defendant’s relationship with car owner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Porte
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-06-24· cited 69×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-11-21· cited 26×
• State v. Breaux
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-01-02· cited 12×
• Commissioner v. Fort
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-01-03· cited 5×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-07-02· cited 4×
• Ramon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-12-08

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Florine
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-02-07· cited 117×
• State v. Willis
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-06-18· cited 23×
• State v. Lorenz
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-05-31· cited 16×
• State v. Maldonado
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-07-30· cited 9×
• State v. Carr
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-11-19· cited 8×
• State v. Cusick
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-10-18· cited 3×