State v. Curtis

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 911

Syllabus

Appellant's arguments pertaining to the trial court's imposition of his sentence for murder in 2009 were barred by res judicata where he could have, and should have, raised the arguments on direct appeal. Further, the trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for a de novo sentencing hearing where the trial court complied with this court's remand instructions by issuing a nunc pro tunc entry to correct errors contained in the court's 2009 sentencing entry.