State v. Curtis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the State was obligated to prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt the exceptional sentence facts”
• concluding that \the State was obligated to prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt the exceptional sentence facts\
• holding that the defendant “could not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his Blakely rights” during allocution when the defendant did not know of these rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Isaacks
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2006-04-24· cited 772×
• State v. Dettman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-08-10· cited 32×
• State v. King
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-06-27· cited 14×
• State v. King
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-09-25· cited 12×
• State v. Ellison
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-03-31· cited 4×
• State Of Washington, V William Henry Ellison
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-03-31

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• Almendarez-Torres v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12,622×
• Neder v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
• State v. Lord
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-02-07· cited 447×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Benn
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-03-05· cited 215×
• State v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-10-25· cited 35×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Echeverria
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-07-27· cited 27×
• State v. Borboa
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-12-07· cited 23×
• State v. Serrano
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-05-18· cited 22×
• State v. Fero
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-01-04· cited 15×