State v. Curtis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• communications with SRS caseworkers are made for purpose of investigation to enable State to take appropriate protective measures
• “Under longstanding practice and precedent, we must not consider constitutional questions unless the disposition of the case requires it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Carter
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-01-12· cited 44×
• State v. Fisher
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-03-21· cited 24×
• State v. Crandall
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-05-20· cited 13×
• In re MVP Health Insurance Company
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-09-23· cited 12×
• In re Appeal of H.H.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2020-12-31· cited 10×
• State v. Duffy
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-03-06· cited 8×
• State v. Whitney
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2005-08-19· cited 5×
• State v. Cuomo
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-10-18· cited 2×
• Appeals fo Valsangiacomo (Decision and Order on Motion for Summary Judgment)
  Vermont Superior Court· 2004-10-05