State v. Curtin
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 4189
Syllabus
CRIMINAL LAW - Resisting Arrest R.C. 2921.33(A) evidence was not against the manifest weight of the evidence evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction elements of arrest a formal arrest is not necessarily an instantaneous event but instead is a process beginning with the seizure of a person, which can encompass acts necessary to effect the formal charging of a crime. The initial handcuffing and detention of a defendant does not mean the arrest for the purposes of resisting arrest has already been completed affirmed.
Judges: Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-22· cited 179×
- State v. CrossOhio Supreme Court· 1979-06-27· cited 82×
- State v. TroisiOhio Court of Appeals· 2008-11-18· cited 42×
- State v. MathisOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.