State v. Curry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The words of the statute are to be given their ordinary meaning unless it appears from context or otherwise that a different sense was intended.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Miller
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-04-29· cited 45×
• Huerta v. Flood
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-11-22· cited 19×
• Hackin v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1967-05-17· cited 18×
• Arizona State Tax Commission v. First Bank Building Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-06-15· cited 17×
• State v. Farrell
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-03-10· cited 10×
• State v. Jaramillo
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-06-05· cited 8×
• Padilla v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-07-10· cited 8×
• State v. Haddock
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-10-05· cited 7×
• State v. Osborn
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-03-16· cited 6×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-10-12· cited 3×
• Saban v. Ador
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-03-13· cited 2×
• State v. Arroyo
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-10-22· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Bigelow
  California Court of Appeal· 1951-05-23· cited 46×
• State v. Gallagher
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-10-28· cited 45×
• State v. Hunt
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1962-04-11· cited 40×
• State v. Jacobs
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1963-06-13· cited 33×
• People v. Sorrentino
  California Court of Appeal· 1956-11-20· cited 30×
• State Board of Dispensing Opticians v. Schwab
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1963-04-17· cited 25×
• State v. Miller
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1957-02-11· cited 3×