Skip to main content
· 1/30/2002

State v. Curless

Citations

  • 44 P.3d 1193
  • 137 Idaho 138
  • 2002 Ida. App. LEXIS 8

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s failure to assert the Fifth Amendment during a psychosexual evaluation precluded him from asserting the privilege on appeal
  • holding that the defendant’s failure to assert the Fifth Amendment during a PSE precluded him from asserting the privilege on appeal
  • no Miranda warnings required prior to a postconviction psychosexual evaluation because it is more akin to a presentence interview than the pretrial competency evaluation in Estelle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perry, Lansing, Schilling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.