· 1/30/2002
State v. Curless
Citations
- 44 P.3d 1193
- 137 Idaho 138
- 2002 Ida. App. LEXIS 8
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant’s failure to assert the Fifth Amendment during a psychosexual evaluation precluded him from asserting the privilege on appeal
- holding that the defendant’s failure to assert the Fifth Amendment during a PSE precluded him from asserting the privilege on appeal
- no Miranda warnings required prior to a postconviction psychosexual evaluation because it is more akin to a presentence interview than the pretrial competency evaluation in Estelle
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Perry, Lansing, Schilling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.