Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/8/2021
State v. Curiel
Citations
- 316 Or. App. 215
- 504 P.3d 629
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing for legal error trial court’s deter- mination that evidence was admissible under evidentiary rule codified by statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lagesen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
- State v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court· 2009-03-05· cited 40×
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-21· cited 16×
- State v. LoboCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-26· cited 12×
- State v. Soto-MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-06· cited 7×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-09· cited 6×
- State v. SzokeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-05-02· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.