Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/16/2023
State v. Cunningham
Citations
- 229 N.E.3d 221
- 2023 Ohio 4305
Syllabus
Trial court conducted heightened Alford inquiry record did not reveal indicia of incompetence, and trial court failed to notify appellant of Reagan Tokes Act requirements.
Judges: Abele
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
- State v. SkatzesOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-08· cited 294×
- State v. BerryOhio Supreme Court· 1995-06-28· cited 279×
- State v. BockOhio Supreme Court· 1986-12-24· cited 231×
- State v. PiacellaOhio Supreme Court· 1971-07-07· cited 128×
- State v. WereOhio Supreme Court· 2002-02-06· cited 92×
- State v. HodgkinOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-19· cited 68×
- State v. MassieOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-24· cited 30×
- State v. BontragerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-19· cited 25×
- State v. AlveloOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-02· cited 20×
- State v. DowdyOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-05-31· cited 11×
- State v. CassellOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-22· cited 9×
- State v. HughesOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-14· cited 8×
- Albert Matut, as the Possessor of Certain Cash v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueEleventh Circuit· 1988-10-25· cited 7×
- State v. WatsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-27· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.