Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/18/2023
State v. Cunningham
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3300
Syllabus
CRIMINAL LAW - motion to intervene cell phone data attorney-client privilege attorney work product ripeness contingent event.
Judges: Trapp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court· 1974-12-16· cited 1,400×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 2009-12-15· cited 136×
- State ex rel. Elyria Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court· 1998-06-10· cited 131×
- State ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. GoodenowOhio Supreme Court· 2010-04-29· cited 76×
- Keller v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court· 2003-11-05· cited 53×
- The State Ex Rel. Jones Et Al. v. HustedOhio Supreme Court· 2016-09-09· cited 25×
- Ohio Renal Assn. v. Kidney Dialysis Patient Protection Amendment Commt. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-08-13· cited 16×
- State v. CunninghamOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-15· cited 2×
- State v. CunninghamOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.