State v. Cunningham
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8333
Syllabus
Defendant-appellant's contention that the trial court did not properly consider the R.C. 2929.12(C) less serious factors is not supported by the record. Further, Defendant-appellant's sentence is not contrary to law, and it cannot be concluded by clear and convincing evidence that the sentence is not supported by the record. Judgment affirmed. (Froelich, J., concurring.)
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 1,010×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-17· cited 175×
- State v. CastleOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-15· cited 44×
- State v. RobersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2001-03-16· cited 17×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-21· cited 4×
- State v. StapletonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-18· cited 3×
- State v. GausOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-08· cited 2×
- State v. StapletonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-07· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.