State v. Cummings
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 3993
Syllabus
Motion for a new trial Crim.R. 33 motion for mistrial materially affect substantial right untimely affidavit motion in limine abuse of discretion prejudice. Judgment affirmed. Trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied defendant's motion for a mistrial when the alleged misconduct by the prosecutor did not materially affect defendant's substantial rights. Additionally, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied defendant's motion for mistrial when the defendant was not prejudiced by the testimony in question.
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court· 2001-01-03· cited 1,260×
- State v. FranklinOhio Supreme Court· 1991-11-20· cited 798×
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court· 2001-01-02· cited 216×
- State v. SuttonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-03· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.