State v. Cummings
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 3356
Syllabus
Defendant's conviction for assault on a peace officer was proper, and he did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel. Defendant cannot show a reasonable probability that a motion to dismiss on speedy-trial grounds would have been successful at the trial court level despite ambiguities with the trial court's sua sponte continuances because the defendant did not affirmatively assert his right at the trial level and provide the State an opportunity to present evidence that the continuances tolled the defendant's time. Additionally, overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt makes it clear that the outcome of the trial could not have been different even if another trial strategy was pursued by counsel.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court· 2001-06-06· cited 807×
- State v. SingerOhio Supreme Court· 1977-05-18· cited 275×
- State v. ButcherOhio Supreme Court· 1986-11-26· cited 229×
- State v. RameyOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-28· cited 105×
- State v. LloydOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-01· cited 35×
- State v. BelvilleOhio Supreme Court· 2022-11-02· cited 23×
- State v. RedelmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-25· cited 14×
- S. Euclid v. SchuttOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-09· cited 12×
- State v. AgostiniOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-30· cited 5×
- State v. BaughOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-07· cited 5×
- State v. MathewsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-10· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.