Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 8/29/2018
State v. Culver
Citations
- 918 N.W.2d 103
- 2018 WI App 55
- 384 Wis. 2d 222
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Absent a speaker's intent to cause serious emotional distress or fear of bodily injury, texts, e-mails, etc., could be construed to be, rather than stalking, benign forms of communication.”
- “Absent a speaker's intent to cause serious emotional distress or fear of bodily injury, texts, e-mails, etc., could be construed to be, rather than stalking, benign forms of communication.”
- “Absent a speaker's intent to cause serious emotional distress or fear of bodily injury, texts, e-mails, etc., could be construed to be, rather than stalking, benign forms of communication.”
- “Absent a speaker's intent to cause serious emotional distress or fear of bodily injury, texts, e-mails, etc., could be construed to be, rather than stalking, benign forms of communication.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gundrum, Neubauer, Reilly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. AustinIllinois Supreme Court· 2019-10-18· cited 22×
- Joseph Brown v. Jeffrey KempSeventh Circuit· 2023-11-13· cited 17×
- State v. James L. Jackson, Jr.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2019-12-26· cited 7×
- Moran v. Wis. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2019-06-11· cited 5×
- People v. AustinIllinois Supreme Court· 2020-11-02· cited 1×
- State v. Leevan RoundtreeWisconsin Supreme Court· 2021-01-07· cited 1×
- State v. RoundtreeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2019-04-04
- Joseph Brown v. Jeffrey KempSeventh Circuit· 2023-11-14
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 3,086×
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 2,188×
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 2,052×
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court· 2010-06-28· cited 2,024×
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court· 2010-04-20· cited 1,327×
- Snyder v. PhelpsSupreme Court· 2011-03-02· cited 867×
- Virginia v. HicksSupreme Court· 2003-06-16· cited 643×
- In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court· 1997-03-19· cited 598×
- Ann Bogie v. Joan AlexandraSangerSeventh Circuit· 2013-01-17· cited 490×
- Cibolo Waste, Incorporated v. City of San AFifth Circuit· 2013-05-16· cited 53×
- Hegwood v. City of Eau ClaireSeventh Circuit· 2012-04-09· cited 39×
- United States v. Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization (Patco), Patco Local 202, Robert Belanger, PresidentFirst Circuit· 1982-05-13· cited 38×
- State v. McCoyWisconsin Supreme Court· 1988-03-22· cited 38×
- State v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court· 2005-05-04· cited 33×
- State v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1990-03-14· cited 29×
- Thayer v. City of WorcesterFirst Circuit· 2014-06-19· cited 17×
- United States v. MatusiewiczD. Delaware· 2015-03-26· cited 7×
- People v. IniguezAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 2016-03-25· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.