State v. Cullen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that conditions of probation may include random urine screens, enrollment in substance abuse program, and attendance at weekly Alcoholics Anonymous meetings
• holding that despite the defendant's \extensive\ prior record, mitigating factor two applied to his drug possession conviction because he possessed \a single baggie containing .33 grams of cocaine\ and his crime A-3781-18T4 31 had neither caused nor threatened serious harm
• finding that mitigating factor two applied to possession of .33 grams of cocaine
• explaining those factors relate to the seriousness of the offense rather than the background and character of the offender

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Meyer
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2007-09-19· cited 27×
• State v. Hannigan
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-07-22· cited 4×
• STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DWAYNE D. BOSTON (15-09-2753, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2021-09-16

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Howard
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-04-19· cited 133×
• State v. Kovack
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-12-07· cited 130×
• State v. Baylass
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-02-07· cited 100×
• State v. Molina
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-02-07· cited 42×
• State v. Malave
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1992-01-31· cited 9×
• State v. Malave
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-07-15· cited 6×
• State v. Zeliff
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-09-28· cited 4×