State v. Cuesta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that common setting of poker game and use of poker jargon in both works did not make the works substantially similar
• finding that the “the only similarities in dialogue between the two works come from the use of common, unprotectable poker jargon”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).