Skip to main content
· 11/26/1996

State v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Citations

  • 673 N.E.2d 517
  • 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 1606
  • 1996 WL 679486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that we presume the General Assembly “intended its language to be applied in a logical manner consistent with the statute’s underlying policy and goals”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Staton, Hoffman, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.