State v. Crymes
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 2655
Syllabus
Preindictment delay The trial court applied the two part burden shifting test for preindictment delay and found appellee suffered actual prejudice and the prosecution had no justifiable reason for the 20 year delay in prosecution. The trial court properly dismissed the case on the ground of unconstitutional preindictment delay.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that assignments of error on direct appeal regarding ineffective assistance of trial coun- sel must specifically allege deficient performance
- stating that “the rule of authentication did not require State to offer [into evidence] all of the Snapchat messages” between the defendant and the victim”
- alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in brief of party asserting error to be considered by appellate court
- to be considered by appellate court, alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in brief
- alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in brief of party asserting error to be considered by appellate court
- assignments of error on direct appeal regarding ineffective assistance of trial counsel must specifically allege deficient performance, and appellate court will not scour remainder of brief in search of such specificity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McCormack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.