State v. Cruz
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3356
Syllabus
Trial court did not rely on false and unreliable information at sentencing and, thus, the trial court did not err in violation of appellant's due process rights. Trial court properly considered appellant's juvenile record when weighing R.C. 2929.12 factors. Trial court correctly found under R.C. 2929.12(B)(6) that the relationship with the victim facilitated the offense. Also, this court is precluded from independently weighing the evidence in connection with R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12 directives.
Judges: Duhart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 5,868×
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 2009-06-18· cited 2,790×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. Hand (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-25· cited 110×
- State v. Toles (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-10-04· cited 92×
- State ex rel. Duran v. KelseyOhio Supreme Court· 2005-08-03· cited 86×
- State v. OrzechowskiOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-26· cited 34×
- State v. StensonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-30· cited 20×
- State v. VargyasOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-24· cited 6×
- State v. JohnstonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.