Skip to main content
· 4/20/2001

State v. Crume

Citations

  • 22 P.3d 1057
  • 271 Kan. 87
  • 2001 Kan. LEXIS 274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming denial of mistrial motion; three violations of order in limine precluding prior-crimes testimony; court admonished jury; evidence against defendant strong
  • even absent a limiting order, prosecutor has duty to guard against statements made by State’s witnesses containing inadmissible evidence
  • even absent a limiting order, a prosecutor has a duty to guard against statements made by his or her witnesses that contain inadmissible evidence
  • accomplice instruction never an absolute necessity, subject to judge’s discretion; may properly refuse to give instruction when defendant’s guilt is plain
  • consistent with K.S.A. 22-3217, district courts have “broad authority ... to consider various matters as may aid in the disposition of the action,” including motion practice
  • consistent with K.S.A. 22-3217, district courts have 'broad authority . . . to consider various matters as may aid in the disposition of the action,' including motion practice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.