· 4/20/2001
State v. Crume
Citations
- 22 P.3d 1057
- 271 Kan. 87
- 2001 Kan. LEXIS 274
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming denial of mistrial motion; three violations of order in limine precluding prior-crimes testimony; court admonished jury; evidence against defendant strong
- even absent a limiting order, prosecutor has duty to guard against statements made by State’s witnesses containing inadmissible evidence
- even absent a limiting order, a prosecutor has a duty to guard against statements made by his or her witnesses that contain inadmissible evidence
- accomplice instruction never an absolute necessity, subject to judge’s discretion; may properly refuse to give instruction when defendant’s guilt is plain
- consistent with K.S.A. 22-3217, district courts have “broad authority ... to consider various matters as may aid in the disposition of the action,” including motion practice
- consistent with K.S.A. 22-3217, district courts have 'broad authority . . . to consider various matters as may aid in the disposition of the action,' including motion practice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lockett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.