Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/24/2017
State v. Crouse
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 1097
Syllabus
Motion to suppress
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that a seizure occurs “[w]hen the actions of the police *** show an unambiguous intent to restrain”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wise
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court· 1982-07-14· cited 2,064×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,950×
- Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2007-06-18· cited 1,523×
- State v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-23· cited 948×
- United States v. Otis Lee Weaver, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2002-02-28· cited 174×
- United States v. Jessie Lee WaldonSixth Circuit· 2000-02-17· cited 145×
- State v. SwiftOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-16· cited 12×
- United States v. Leonel Hinojosa, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 2013-08-23· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.